Sign in
Opinion piece

Learning from Q Lab: reflections on flow theory

Highlights from Q’s first Lab on how patients and staff can collaborate on ways to reduce waits for elective care.

Spela Godec (Insight and Evaluation Manager at Q) and Sarah Rae (an expert in patient and public involvement, working with Q Lab as a co-researcher) share highlights from the first Q Lab workshop exploring how we can work together to reduce waits for elective care.

Addressing patient flows through collective ownership

Since August 2023, five test teams from England and Wales have been working collaboratively to address issues with flow, build collective ownership and reduce waits.

On 21 September 2023, the test teams, co-researchers and contributors met in London for the first Q Lab workshop. The workshop provided a space for the test teams to share insights from their research and receive input from participants and contributors.

Theory of Flow workshop participants 

The workshop featured a presentation on the Theory of Flow, developed by the Flow Coaching Academy. After the presentation, participants were invited to explore how to use this approach to address the challenge of wait times.

Using the liberating structure of a Conversation Cafe, people were prompted to consider what they were thinking, feeling, or doing about the content that had been shared. From their reflections, three themes emerged.

Providing a language and theory for people’s experiences

While many participants were new to the flow theory, the ideas resonated with their experiences and thinking. As one mentioned, it’s so much like the conversations we’ve been having in our [community paediatrics] work, just not calling it flow”. 

The two messages from the flow theory presentation that received the most attention were that demand is predictable and that flow x must equal flow y (in other words, the flow into a service must equal the flow out). Naming this equation explicitly provided participants with fresh energy for deeper exploration and discussion.

Teams explored concepts and theories such as failure demand and the theory of constraints. Participants observed that naming the common issues could help them to make a stronger case to their organisation for the need for a joined-up, system approach to tackling waits.

Shifting from fixing issues to system-level redesign

The importance of looking at issues systemically, central to flow theory, strongly resonated with the workshop participants. You might be able to fix one bit of the system, but change is limited if other parts don’t change – flow theory shows this so clearly.” 

There were mentions of exciting and innovative practices from the UK and beyond. However, there were also frustrations with how much of the current practice is limited to quick fixes and influenced by risk aversion.

Sustainable change in reducing waits in elective care

Participants discussed what is required to support sustainable change in reducing waits in elective care. 

First, leadership needs to be courageous and have trust in the professionals who are leading innovation and improvement to support them in challenging the established ways of doing. 

Second, there is also a need to rethink how and when we evaluate the success of initiatives, recognising that a system-level change likely takes longer for the positive impact to materialise. 

Finally, participants echoed the points made by the Flow Coaching Academy that tackling waits requires collaboration with stakeholders from across the system. Participants discussed different ways to approach this in the current climate and with winter pressures starting.

Sarah Rae offers a whole journey perspective

Sarah Rae offered her reflections on how involving patients from the onset can help teams to gain a more holistic understanding of the journey that patients go through as they move from one appointment to the next.

People with lived experience can help those working on flow and reducing waits because they can reinforce the message that, for us, this is not about one isolated aspect of the pathway – it’s a journey. It’s a care pathway that we’ve been on. They may see barriers to flow that are not regarded as important or that people who are working in the system might even dismiss.

We ought to ensure that patient value is designed into the system. So that you’re not just thinking about how the patients will now flow from here to here, but you’re designing in the value to patients at every step of their journey.

Sarah Rae, PPI Advisor and Co-founder of Promise

Sarah’s advice for anyone starting is to remember that co-production and working with patients is messy but that starting somewhere is always more valuable than not engaging patients at all.

Read about The Patient Experience Library and find a PPI approach for your project
Find out about the Conversation Cafe and other Liberating Structures

Groups that contributed to this opinion piece

Making use of patient experience
263 members
Last active 9 Dec 2024

Do we over-measure patient experience? Are we helped by the Friends and Family Test, CQC patient surveys, NHS Choices star ratings, Patient Opinion snapshot comments, local Healthwatch reports, Trust and CCG surveys and focus groups, and all the rest? Or are we just confused by it all? This group aims to analyse the suite of tools available to measure patient experience, looking for those which have the most practical use for quality improvement. We want to publish a shorter paper with recommendations for how the NHS can de-clutter the measurement of patient experience, and help patient experience leads to make use of fewer and better data sets.

PPI and Diversity
141 members
Last active 8 Oct 2025

Serious clinical and service failings in the UK and internationally have increased the calls for patients and the public to be engaged in healthcare to improve patient safety. These calls are now reflected in key policy statements such as Patients and their carers should be present, powerful and involved at all levels of healthcare organisations from wards to the boards of Trusts’ (A promise to learn – a commitment to act: National Advisory Group on the Safety of Patients in England, 2013). The aim of the Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) and Diversity group is to explore what PPI and diversity and equality means in the context of quality and safety improvement and how a broader group of patients and the public can best be involved in these activities.

Discover more

email hidden; JavaScript is required
Q, The NHS Alliance, 2nd Floor, 18 Smith Square, London, SW1P 3HZ
© 2026 The Health Foundation
Website: William Joseph